(no subject)
Jul. 17th, 2010 11:01 pmhttp://nba.fanhouse.com/2010/07/15/with-the-heat-its-not-about-a-salary/
Bethlehem Shoals, the best basketball writer I've ever read, on the LeBron story. As usual, he frames it in a way that would have otherwise eluded me, but makes a tremendous amount of sense.
Not perfect sense. Shoals is too hip, too ironic, for that. LeBron and Wade are among the most notably apolitical of major NBA stars, with LeBron famously being called out several years ago for not taking a stand against China's trade relations with the Sudan, during the Beijing Olympics. This is a background Shoals is aware of, but chooses to ignore because he assumes his readers are familiar with it, too. Given what we know of the players involved, the idea that this was purely an economic power play is nonsensical. Obviously the friendships involved are part of the story. Obviously the lure of South Beach was party of the story. And I don't completely disagree with those who suspect that Bosh and Wade are bigger winners than LeBron in some senses.
Still, the reactions from many of the people involved tell us that even if it wasn't fully intended, that was the effect it had. The Mini-Max deals LeBron engineered several years ago were the most impressive thing we've seen from him politically: a daring, colossal risk whose payout is measured far more in power and influence than in money. LeBron makes max money no matter what, unless he suffers a career ending injury. But transforming this summer into the Summer of LeBron was a spectacular move. And dragging his buddies along, making Bosh and Wade and Amare and Joe Johnson part of the party... that was a statement move. That was about saying "You need us more than we need you." And of course, it was pulled off the year before the NBA labor contract needs to be renegotiated. Power politics, seriously.
Bethlehem Shoals, the best basketball writer I've ever read, on the LeBron story. As usual, he frames it in a way that would have otherwise eluded me, but makes a tremendous amount of sense.
Not perfect sense. Shoals is too hip, too ironic, for that. LeBron and Wade are among the most notably apolitical of major NBA stars, with LeBron famously being called out several years ago for not taking a stand against China's trade relations with the Sudan, during the Beijing Olympics. This is a background Shoals is aware of, but chooses to ignore because he assumes his readers are familiar with it, too. Given what we know of the players involved, the idea that this was purely an economic power play is nonsensical. Obviously the friendships involved are part of the story. Obviously the lure of South Beach was party of the story. And I don't completely disagree with those who suspect that Bosh and Wade are bigger winners than LeBron in some senses.
Still, the reactions from many of the people involved tell us that even if it wasn't fully intended, that was the effect it had. The Mini-Max deals LeBron engineered several years ago were the most impressive thing we've seen from him politically: a daring, colossal risk whose payout is measured far more in power and influence than in money. LeBron makes max money no matter what, unless he suffers a career ending injury. But transforming this summer into the Summer of LeBron was a spectacular move. And dragging his buddies along, making Bosh and Wade and Amare and Joe Johnson part of the party... that was a statement move. That was about saying "You need us more than we need you." And of course, it was pulled off the year before the NBA labor contract needs to be renegotiated. Power politics, seriously.