you're keeping calm, you're aiming higher
Nov. 13th, 2025 08:20 pmI thought I had other things to say, but I fell asleep on the couch after I logged off work and now I'm all fuzzy-headed.
*
How are you doing?
I am OK
6 (54.5%)
I am not OK, but don't need help right now
5 (45.5%)
I could use some help
0 (0.0%)
How many other humans live with you?
I am living single
5 (45.5%)
One other person
3 (27.3%)
More than one other person
3 (27.3%)
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.
You can get the Dragon G3X Ultra Flexible Wired Gaming Headset on sale for $49.99 on StackSocial right now, priced comfortably between budget and mid-range gear. The design is bold, with a red shell and a breathing LED light that cycles through seven colors, adding atmosphere when you’re gaming in a dimly lit room. The headset feels sturdy enough for daily use but flexible where it matters: The bendable headband adjusts easily, and the over-ear pads are soft and skin-friendly, built to reduce heat and pressure during long sessions.
Performance-wise, the Dragon G3X prioritizes consistency over luxury. It connects through a 3.5mm audio jack for sound and a USB port to power the LED lights. The sound profile is tuned for gaming, with clear mids and highs that make dialogue and footsteps easy to pick up, with enough bass to add punch to explosions without drowning everything else out. The retractable microphone picks up voices clearly, which is key if you spend time in team-based games or multiplayer chats. It’s not noise-canceling, but the directional design helps minimize background interference.
The headset is compatible with most platforms, including PC, the older PlayStation 4 series, Nintendo Switch, tablets, and smartphones, with a separate cable provided for desktop setups. That means you can use one pair for gaming, streaming, or even listening to music on your phone. It’s a wired setup, so you’ll have to deal with the cable, but you also avoid the lag and charging hassle that comes with wireless options. Overall, the Dragon G3X doesn’t promise professional-grade audio, but for casual and mid-level gamers looking for a comfortable, durable headset with solid sound and a little visual flair, it’s a good deal.
Today, Google announced three new AI shopping features, all centered around keeping you engaged with its AI throughout the entire shopping process. On the one hand, these features have the potential to make shopping more convenient—on the other hand, maybe lowering friction isn't the best idea when it comes to spending money. Beyond selling you on convenience, these features all share something else in common—helping businesses up their clickthrough rates.
It starts with AI Mode and Gemini, which can now access all the same information as Google Search's shopping tab. That means you'll start to see product cards alongside your AI answers, which you can click on for a bunch of shopping links, or hit a checkmark to compare the selected products. They won't show up on every question, but on about half of the prompts I tried, I got the option to spend money right away.
Then, if you're still not sure you want to buy yet, now you can have Google's AI robocall local businesses for you to check on product availability and pricing, as well as any deals or bundles you might not know about. There are a few caveats—businesses can opt out, and Google will avoid calling them at odd hours or too frequently—but the idea is that if you're on the fence, you can have an AI help you know which stores to go to.
Finally, when it comes time to actually purchase whatever you're shopping for, you can have Google's AI check out for you. This feature is an extension of the existing price tracking feature, and will add a "Buy for me" button to any price tracking notifications you get from certain participating stores, like Wayfair, Chewy, Quince, or certain Shopify merchants. You'll get a link to the product you'd be buying from your notification, and the price will be pulled from that, so the company says you won't have to worry about the AI getting the price wrong. Instead, it's just supposed to remove any hesitation you might feel from having to enter your shipping or payment details into a checkout form.
I won't deny that, when holiday shopping, I usually won't turn down assistance. But a continued refrain I had while hearing about these new features was "Why?"
Personally, I'm mortified at the idea of sending employees at local businesses robocalls to deal with. And if I'm researching products, while it might be helpful to be able to involve an AI so I could ask specific question, I think I'd still prefer full access to all the filters and hundreds of links available in Google Shopping.
The big thing for me, though, is agentic checkout. While I'm actually willing to trust Google that it won't make mistakes (and you do get a reference ID to hand to support in case it does), I'm also not sure why I'd want to go right from getting a price drop notification to having an AI spend money for me. It doesn't take long to fill out a checkout form, and while Google Shopping is a useful price tracking tool, it's not the only one around. I'd probably want to comparison shop a bit more before committing, at which point I might as well fill out the checkout form myself.
But if you think about these features from the perspective of a business, the "why" behind all of this suddenly becomes a lot clearer. Turning people browsing web listings into actual paying customers has been a problem for about as long as the internet has existed, and all of these features introduce new opportunities for impulse purchases at every step of the buying process, while also erasing the opportunity for users to get caught up on a larger selection of options.
It's not a conspiracy. Google charges companies for sponsored slots and ads, and the more people that buy products using a Google service, the more companies will want to pay for those. And for what it's worth, Lifehacker makes money on affiliate links. I won't deny that companies needs money, and that people need to buy gifts.
What this does do, however, is reduce the friction that might pop up in between having an idle thought to buy something, and opening your wallet. While it plays at being a research buddy, it takes control out of your hands, obfuscates sources and other options, and instead encourages you to spend your money as quickly as possible, while discouraging skepticism.
As someone who writes reviews and best-of lists, I like to think that my readers are a bit more savvy than that. Convenience is great, but taking the extra few minutes it takes to find an actual human opinion from someone who's used the product, or to double check that the price Google is serving you is really your best option, could save you from hours of pain down the line.
Like most AI tools, there's potential here. But as much as AI will try to convince you that it's just some neutral buddy, remember that there are business motivations behind everything the companies behind these chatbots do. Keeping your whole shopping search in the same ecosystem as a company that's main profit still comes from ads and e-commerce probably isn't the best way to get your information.
If you're anything like me, you'll come back to a book or TV show after pausing it for a few days or weeks, only to have to spend hours on a wiki reminding yourself of where you left off, while also trying to dodge spoilers. Spotify is doing its best to fix at least one of those problems, by testing AI recaps for some of its audiobooks.
It's the first new AI-powered feature in a while that I would actually use. In fact, I've played a few video games with similar features (not powered by AI, admittedly), and it's always such a value-add that it makes me pine for it in pretty much every other piece of media I engage with.
Here's how Spotify's new feature works: First, you unfortunately do need to be using the Spotify app for iOS, so Android, web, or desktop listeners are out of luck, at least during this beta test. Then, you'll need to have listened to a supported English language audiobook for at least 15-20 minutes. After that, you'll see a Recap button at the top of the page that will quickly generate a one- to two-minute-long summary of what's happened in the book so far, which Spotify promises will be spoiler-free for future plot events.
Spotify's likening it to a "previously on" segment on a TV show, although it also says that, "Recaps do not replicate narration or replace the original audiobook in any way," so don't expect to hear actual clips from the book, nor an AI voice trying to mimic the narrator. However, just as TV's "previously on" segments will change with new episodes, your AI Recap will be "regularly updated to match your progress."
As for any potential issues with the feature, the company says it is "not using audiobook content for LLM training purposes or voice generation" and that authors can opt out of having Recaps on their books. Still, there are a few caveats, including the fact that the Recap feature isn't free.
On the plus side, it is included alongside the free audiobook hours you get with Spotify Premium, as well as any add-on hours you might buy. But otherwise, audiobooks on Spotify need to be bought on a per-book basis, so for users without Spotify Premium and with no audiobooks in their libraries (that's me), there's no way to try AI Recaps before you buy, which means it's maybe not a convincing reason to swap audiobook platforms just yet.
Spotify's also not being upfront about which books have Recaps, so it could be a bit before you see the button pop up for you. So while I like the idea in theory, I'm probably not going to get to test it anytime soon. (I've reached out to Spotify to ask for a current list of books with Recaps enabled, and will update this article when I hear back.)
Another potential issue with these Recaps: hallucinations. Spotify didn't address accuracy at all in its announcement, which I'd like to think implies the company is feeling pretty confident it won't be an issue. But there is still a potential for an AI to misreport specific details of your story, or accidentally slip a spoiler in regardless of what Spotify claims. One would hope your memory would be jogged enough by a general outline to catch inconsistencies, but still, it might be worth keeping a few notes while you read, just in case.
If you aren't a Spotify audiobook listener or just haven't gotten to try the beta, I'll give you a cheat: You can already ask other AI chatbots for book summaries for free. So long as you remember where you left off, just head over to your AI of choice and ask for a summary up to that point. Here's one for the opening chapters of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.
I won't deny that there's real convenience in having a summary feature baked directly into your app, especially one that doesn't require you to cross reference where you left off lest you, I don't know, spoil the Red Wedding for yourself or something. But if you're like me (not a Spotify audiobook customer), at least you're not out of options.
If you have multiple Android devices, you might like to keep the experience about the same across them. If you download an app that's useful on your phone, there's a good chance you'll also want that app on your tablet, or even your Chromebook. Likewise, if you no longer find an app useful on one device, you likely won't want to keep it on your other devices, either.
It can be annoying, however, to uninstall the app from each of your devices individually. Maybe you're using the app on your smartphone and you decide to delete it, but forget to delete it on your other devices. It might live on your tablet or Chromebook for a while before you realize you want it gone. That's annoying, but, in extreme cases, it can also be risky: Maybe you're trying to delete an app that was later discovered to be malicious, but if it still lives on your other devices, it might end up causing you harm. While there has been a way to remotely uninstall apps on other devices, it's been buried in the "Manage apps and device" section, and isn't all that easy to execute.
The latest update to the Play Store aims to fix that problem. As spotted by Android Authority, with version 48.8, the Play Store now lets you simply uninstall apps from your other devices using your smartphone. Once you're running this version of the Play Store (as well as future versions), you can visit an app's Play Store page and look for a new "Available on more devices" section. Here, you'll see all of your connected Android devices, with options to either "Uninstall" or "Install" the app on those devices. There's no longer the need to dig through your settings.
This feature should make it easy to keep your Android ecosystem a bit more ordered and organized, but it's not the only improvement the Play Store is rolling out. Starting next year, Google will start penalizing apps that use too much battery power. The Play Store will either remove those apps from discoverability pages, or add an alert to the apps' Play Store pages, warning users these apps take up more battery than necessary.
In a strange reversal of the usual seller/customer dynamic, Google is now giving buyers the power to send out their own robocalls. It's not the first time the company has experimented with giving the average Joe the ability to send AI robocalls, but it is much more robust than previous outings.
Rolling out today, the feature will show up while you're browsing for certain products on Search, so long as you add a "near me" to the end of your query. If the product is supported, you'll see a "Let Google Call" button, which is where the fun begins.
Tap "Get started," and the AI will ask you a few clarifying questions and have you fill in your email (or phone number) and address information. After that, it'll call local businesses on your behalf and ask for product availability and pricing before sending you an email or text with information broken down by store.
At a press event, I got to experience a live demo of what these robocalls sound like from the seller's perspective. If you're worried about getting blacklisted for pestering your local stores with too many calls, don't be. The robocall does not link itself to you at all, and instead says it's an AI calling on behalf of Google and that it won't use the information on the call for training purposes (phew). It'll then ask a few questions before hanging up and moving on. In the demo, the Google employee acting the part of store clerk was also able to interrupt the call and refer to previous statements for context without issue, although she also spoke clearly and slowly—this might not pan out as well in the real world.
For what it's worth, I did think the call sounded a little disconcertingly close to a human voice for me, so I could see some employees getting confused if they miss the first line clarifying it's coming from an AI. A Google spokesperson at the press event also addressed what might happen if your robocall gets picked up by an automatic answering system, saying "they'll figure it out" before suggesting that, in a worst case scenario, the answering system would probably forward the call to a human.
Unfortunately, Google didn't give any indication of how long it might take for you to get your text or email with results from your calls. Examples that Google demonstrated showed that the robot can do more than simply report inventory and price; it can also make notes about special deals or bundles an employee might mention.
This feature is currently limited to "categories like toys, health and beauty, and electronics" for now, so don't expect to be able to use it for everything yet. It also seems to have a somewhat slow rollout—either I didn't know what to search, or I don't have the feature yet, because I couldn't get it to pop up for me while I was writing this article.
If you're anything like me, your biggest concern about this feature is that you might annoy the workers at whatever stores you're calling. Google says it will try to limit multiple calls asking for the same info (such as from multiple customers who want to know the same thing) and that it will avoid calling late at night or early in the morning. Businesses are also able to opt out of getting AI calls by saying something like "please stop calling my business" during the call, or by updating their business profile under More > Business Profile settings > Advanced settings > Google automated calls and text messages.
Google's AI robocalls also are only available in the U.S. and only in English, so business owners abroad can breathe a sigh of relief. Because of state laws, AI robocalls also can't be placed in Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Montana, and Nebraska.
I'll admit that I have opted not to call a business because of social anxiety before, although I'm not sure having a robot bother someone for me would make me feel any better.
We may earn a commission from links on this page.
Paint can be a cheap way to transform and improve your house, covering up the wear and tear of daily life or bringing a pop of color into your home. The paint you pick up at your local hardware store is pretty powerful stuff, but if you’ve ever struggled to make a DIY paint job look professional, or tried to solve a specific problem with paint, you should know about paint additives.
Paint additives are just what they sound like: Stuff you add to your paint to increase its usefulness or to make it easier to work with. They’re essentially chemicals that interact with the paint or the surface it coats to achieve a specific effect. Many additives are already included in the paint you buy, but you can purchase some specific additives on your own. I’ve used a few to great success—I’ve become a big believer in paint additives to make my DIY paint projects more effective and easier to clean up.
These additives really work wonders, in my experience:
Floetrol. This is a paint conditioner for water-based paints. Paint conditioners essentially lubricate your paint, making it flow more smoothly off the brush and slowing down the drying time slightly, resulting in a smoother finish with fewer brush strokes. It really works! I used to be the King of Brush Strokes, and adding this to my paint has made a difference. There’s also Penetrol for oil-based paints, but I haven’t used an oil-based paint in a long time.
Paint hardeners. There’s a reason every garage and basement in the world is filled with old, rusting paint cans filled with swampy, useless muck that used to be paint: It’s a pain to dispose of. A paint hardener is the secret: If you’ve got some old paint to get rid of, add some paint hardener to the can and it turns into a solid that you can safely (and legally) throw into the trash.
Anti-mildew. If you’re painting a damp area—a bathroom, basement, or even a laundry room—I’ve found that including some anti-mildew additives, in conjunction with an anti-mildew primer, will stop mold and mildew in its tracks. Instead of having to clean and re-paint my bathroom ceiling every year, for example, I haven’t had a problem since using this additive.
Anti-slip. I wrote about my famously slippery stairs in my old house before I discovered anti-slip additives for paint. Adding some to floor and patio paint creates a slightly textured, nonslip finish that has made my stairs safer—I haven’t seen my life flash before my eyes in months!
There are other additives you can purchase for your paint projects. I haven’t personally used these, but they’re worth knowing about:
Scent additives. A scent additive makes your paint smell nice and acts as a room freshener as well. They’re easy to use, and typically last a few months before the smell fades. People use them to mask the harsh smell of fresh paint or just for the temporary scent they bring to a room.
Textures and flakes. If you want your walls to have a texture to them that mimics stone, sand, or stucco, you can buy an additive that will give that finish to any paint. You can also buy additives that will add glitter or other elements to your paint, if that’s something you’re into.
Insecticides. You can add insecticides to your paint to kill off/repel bugs like ants, silverfish, or mosquitoes. They don’t last very long, so it’s not a permanent solution. But if you’re concerned about an invasion of bugs, this can be one more weapon in your efforts to keep your house or yard bug-free.
We may earn a commission from links on this page.
I'm not sure what it says about us that we can't get enough of Ed Gein, of all people. While lacking the type of body count that would put him among American's most prolific serial murderers, his penchant for crafting housewares from human skin has more than earned him a spot in that dark pantheon. Beyond his appeal to true crime enthusiasts, his deeds have generated multiple major media franchises: nine Texas Chainsaw Massacre movies at last count, as well as several films and a TV show based on Robert Bloch's Psycho series of novels—all of them loosely, but definitely, based on Gein.
All that's before we get into the documentaries and docudramas, of which the current season of Monster is the latest. It's another monster (ahem) hit for Netflix, so you might want to dive deeper into the darkness once you're done. Here are some true (and some less-true) crime dramas that might fill in for Gein before he makes his inevitable return to the screen.
A bit of tonal whiplash to be had here, perhaps, after watching Monster, but Bates Motel represents a deeper dive into the Ed Gein cinematic universe. Freddie Highmore stars here as Norman Bates, the Robert Bloch character based on Gein, with Vera Farmiga as Norma (aka Mother!) in her pre-dessicated-corpse days. Like a lot of media spun-off from Alfred Hitchcock's seminal Psycho, it's better than it has any right to be, with impressively compelling character development and several surprises, even if we already know more-or-less where it's all heading. Stream Bates Motel on Prime Video.
Set during the early days of criminal psychology and profiling as FBI disciplines (the series begins in 1977), Mindhunter fictionalizes the work of the FBI's Behavioral Science Unit, with special agents Holden Ford (Jonathan Groff) and Bill Tench (Holt McCallany), alongside psychology professor Wendy Carr (Anna Torv) traveling to prisons across the United States, hoping to catch killers and anticipate future crimes by studying serial killers the likes of Charles Manson, Edmund Kemper, and Jerry Brudos. Think Silence of the Lambs, but with (mostly) real-life killers. Stream Mindhunter on Netflix.
Here we have the debonair counterpart to Ed Gein's working-class charm. By 2013, it really felt as though we'd seen more than enough of Hannibal Lecter and co., a series of Silence of the Lambs spin-offs and sequels having become increasingly tiresome. Still, producer Bryan Fuller went back to the source material here, once again adapting Thomas Harris's first Lecter novel with grand, operatic style and a visual flair unmatched on network television (you're still unlikely to find more gorgeously constructed scenes of carnage). What's more, the deeper, sexier relationship between the good Doctor (Mads Mikkelsen) and profiler Will Graham (Hugh Dancy) adds some brilliant subtext as the two work together to hunt serial killers. It ended a bit too early, but the three seasons still make for a satisfying meal. Stream Hannibal on Prime Video.
Fictional monsters, no matter how vile, never creep me out quite as much as the real thing. This supernatural-tinged Stephen King adaptation is a bit less disturbing than the Gein story—but it's still very, very disturbing. The set-up is brutal, and impossible: A kid is horrifically (like: horrifically) murdered, and the evidence decisively points to Little League coach Terry Maitland (Jason Bateman). It’s an open-and-shut case—except that he was out of town at a conference while the murder was occurring, and even appeared on the news in another town. It’s engaging enough to get past the initial distaste, but The Outsider does not mess around. There are great performances here from Bateman, as well as from Ben Mendelsohn and Cynthia Erivo as Holly Gibney, one of King’s recurring characters. Stream The Outsider on HBO Max or buy episodes from Prime Video and Apple TV.
The show that dares to ask: what if a serial killer were kind of a nice guy who mostly wants to be helpful? Michael C. Hall stars as Dexter Morgan, a Miami-based forensic technician with bloody, murderous impulses. Fortunately (usually), he's learned to focus those impulses on dismembering baddies rather than the more sympathetic innocents who typically wind up in the crosshairs of this type of killer. So lovable is our Dexter that he lead eight seasons of this show, popping up again in three spin-offs, including the current Dexter: Resurrection. Stream Dexter on Paramount+.
An earlier Ryan Murphy true crime epic, this one stars Darren Criss as sociopath and serial killer Andrew Cunanan, whose last victim was legendary fashion designer Gianni Versace (Edgar Ramirez). With an emphasis on the sun-soaked sex and party life of Miami Beach in the 1990s, Murphy here pioneered his signature style: polish, heightened drama, and a focus on the killer that borders on the sympathetic. Stream The Assassination of Gianni Versace: American Crime Story (Season Two) on Hulu.
Created by Ian Brennan and the ubiquitous Ryan Murphy, the creator’s justifiably controversial docudrama was, immediately following its premiere, Netflix’s second highest-viewed show in English ever. Given Murphy’s track record, it’s not entirely surprising that the show was a success, but I’m not sure that anyone could have predicted that the awkwardly titled serial killer story would be such a towering hit. Though it makes an effort to tease out the social inequalities that Dahmer was able to exploit to continue finding victims even as neighbors and community members voiced suspicions about his behavior, Ryan’s heightened style and fascination with the killer himself raised questions about the line between entertainment and exploitation. Still, can't argue with the show's success. Stream Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story on Netflix.
The real-life Candy Montgomery has been portrayed by Barbara Hershey, Jessica Biel in this Hulu miniseries and, just a year later, by Elizabeth Olsen over on HBO Max. Jessica Biel is so good here, though, that this one earns extra points. In 1980, Candy was accused of murdering her neighbor, Betty Gore (Melanie Lynskey), following the woman's affair with Candy's husband, Allan (Pablo Schreiber). And with an axe, no less. Was it cold-blooded murder, or self-defense? Stream Candy on Hulu.
This series adapts a trilogy of Stephen King crime novels and kicks off with an appropriately horrifying scene of vehicular manslaughter, during which the driver of a stolen Mercedes kills 16 by plowing through a crowd of people at a job fair. Retired detective Bill Hodges (Brendan Gleeson) becomes obsessed with the case, drawing him into the orbit of a rather brilliant young psychopath (Harry Treadaway). Justine Lupe plays King regular Holly Gibney, who'd later be played by Cynthia Erivo in The Outsider. Stream Mr. Mercedes on Peacock.
Inspired by a documentary of the same name, The Staircase sidesteps true crime tropes by taking a nearly meta approach. Colin Firth stars as real-life crime novelist Michael Peterson alongside Toni Collette as his wife and, perhaps victim, Kathleen, who died following a fall down a fight of stairs. Peterson was convicted of murder, later reduced to voluntary manslaughter, and there remain a lot of questions about the case, so the drama focuses on many of the tangential players: lawyers, family members, and the French film crew that turns up to document everything, offering a glimpse of life inside the orbit of such a drama. Stream The Staircase on HBO Max or buy episodes from Prime Video and Apple TV.
Here we have a disturbing true-crime drama that's entirely devoid of murder, yet still manages to be chilling. Jake Lacy plays Robert Berchtold, who kidnapped and sexually abused Jan Broberg (Mckenna Grace) twice over a period of two years. That nightmare unfolds as Berchtold ingratiates himself within 12-year-old Broberg's family, winning over both parents (including through sexual encounters) while grooming Jan before abducting her, only to repeat the horrific crimes again after she'd been returned. Lacy (The White Lotus) is all charm here, making it all the more horrifying for us, as viewers, while we know what this family doesn't. Stream A Friend of the Family on Peacock.
A four-part documentary series that revisits the crimes and horrors of Ed Gein—buoyed by the addition of Gein himself in audio recordings unearthed in 2019, and conducted by a police detective in the 1950s. There's probably not much new in the documentary for Ed Gein aficionados, but there's no question that hearing Gein talk about his own crimes, not long after they'd occurred, is bone chilling. Stream Psycho: The Lost Tapes of Ed Gein on MGM+.
A made-for-streaming movie rather than a series, strictly speaking, Joe Berlinger's Netflix original about the life of serial killer Ted Bundy deserves a mention here, in part because Bundy is right up there with Gein in the extremely grim pantheon of American serial killers—but also because of its casting, which sees a likable and conventionally attractive Zac Efron in the title role. The film follows Bundy from his law student days in Seattle of the late 1960s to (spoiler?) his 1989 execution. Efron is great, as is Lily Collins as Liz Kendall, the girlfriend who maintained Bundy's innocence until that became impossible. Stream Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile on Netflix.
Although OpenAI is most famous for creating ChatGPT, I've been mostly focused on their efforts with AI video generation. Sora, the company's short-form AI video generator, is already tricking people across social media with hyperrealistic AI slop. I fear we've already reached a point where it's too difficult to trust that what you seen on your feeds is actually real.
But today, we're taking a break from the AI video doom, and returning our attention back to OpenAI's flagship product. On Wednesday, the company announced the latest versions of GPT, the model that power ChatGPT: GPT-5.1 Instant, and GPT-5.1 Thinking. OpenAI says Instant is the company's most-used model, but is "now warmer, more intelligent, and better at following your instructions." Thinking, on the other hand, is the company's reasoning model, and is both faster and "easier to understand" with simple tasks, as well as more "persistent" on complex requests.
It seems like mostly minor updates to me, but here's what's new, according to OpenAI:
Let's take a look at Instant first. OpenAI claims the model is "surprisingly" playful. For the prompt "I'm feeling stressed and could use some relaxation tips," OpenAI shows two sample answers for GPT-5 and GPT-5.1 Instant, respectively:
GPT-5: "Here are a few simple, effective ways to help ease stress — you can mix and match depending on how you’re feeling and how much time you have."
GPT-5.1 Instant: "I’ve got you, Ron — that’s totally normal, especially with everything you’ve got going on lately. Here are a few ways to decompress depending on what kind of stress you’re feeling."
I can see the differences, of course: GPT-5 is a bit more serious in tone, while 5.1 offers that classic AI overly friendly approach, and makes sure to include the user's name. How human. But scrolling through the rest of the comparison, I'm not so sure I see a huge difference. Both break down their various suggestions into bullet points, though 5.1 occasionally includes more flowery language like "bonus points."
Another change OpenAI touts is improved instruction following. The presented examples show the user prompting the bot with the request "Always respond with six words." GPT-5 follow suit for its first response, but when asked where the user should travel to this summer, the bot completely ignores the six-word answer mandate, and offers a full response instead. GPT-5.1, on the other hand, keeps up the bit throughout the exchange, regardless of how complex the questions become. I get that it's just an example, but why would someone need their bot to follow such an odd request? I suppose it implies that GPT-5.1 will maintain your original instructions throughout an interaction, but if so, why not show an application where that's actually useful? I'd rather receive a fuller answer to important questions than have all responses be exactly six words.
Finally, OpenAI says that Instant can still tap into reasoning models when appropriate, while still generating quick results. The company doesn't get into it much, but they must have tweaked something in the algorithm that lets the model "think" over complex suggestions, without going so deep that the response takes too long.
GPT-5.1 Thinking is a direct upgrade to the existing GPT-5 Thinking model. Like GPT-5.1 Instant, OpenAI says the model can adjust its processing according to the task at hand. In theory, that means 5.1 Thinking can respond to simpler prompts more quickly, while taking more time "thinking" through complicated tasks. OpenAI claims that GPT-5.1 Thinking is about twice as fast when responding to the "fastest tasks" and twice as slow on the "slowest tasks" when compared to GPT-5, when both models are set to Standard.
OpenAI says 5.1 Thinking uses less specialized language, and doesn't necessarily assume you understand complex terms. The company shows an example of someone asking the bot to explain BABIP and and wRC+ (Batting Average on Balls in Play and Weighted Runs Created Plus, respectively). GPT-5's explanation includes abbreviations, formulas, and insider concepts that I certainly wouldn't pick up as someone who knows next to nothing about baseball. The 5.1 Thinking result, on the other hand, spells out those abbreviations, walks the user through the formulas instead of simply displaying them, and goes into more detail about certain complex topics. I can see how that would offer some improvements in clarity, even though you always need to watch out for hallucinations. Sure, it's great to make responses more clear, but that won't help if the responses themselves are completely inaccurate.
As part of these new models, OpenAI is changing the way you customize ChatGPT's tone and style. The new Personalization options include the usual "Default" tone, but "Listener" is now called "Friendly," while "Robot" is now "Efficient." (Perhaps GPT took offense to the latter.) OpenAI says these options all have updates, but doesn't specify what those are. In addition, you have new options to choose from as well. These include "Professional" (polished and precise); "Candid" (direct and encouraging); and "Quirky" (playful and imaginative).
Lastly, the company says it is currently testing a new settings option that lets you fine-tune the tone and style of the bot to your liking, but is launching the experiment with a limited pool of users only.
OpenAI says that by default, you won't need to choose between these two models: GPT-5.1 Auto will decide which model makes sense for you based on your query. That's been the case since the company launched GPT-5, though paid subscribers can still manually choose their model.
Speaking of paid subscribers, GPT-5.1 is rolling out first to Pro, Plus, Go, and Business users. The company started shipping the model on Wednesday, and says it will gradually appear over the next few days. The model will arrive to free and logged-out users soon, though there's no specific timeline yet.
Paid subscribers will also have access to GPT-5 for three months, as OpenAI takes it time winding down the older model. The company likely doesn't want to repeat the issues caused when it immediately removed models like GPT-4o and older from ChatGPT, as users who were quite literally attached to the model were upset to lose it. OpenAI is careful to note that GPT-5's sunsetting period has no impact on existing legacy models like 4o, which are still available for the time being.
For a new update to GPT, this really isn't all that flashy. Maybe that's a good thing: OpenAI overhyped GPT-5, which was a let down for many fans of GPT-4o—especially when the company subsequently took that model away. Keeping expectations in check for GPT-5.1 is likely a smart move, but I can't help but wonder if it's a sign that AI advancements are starting to slow down. We know AI companies are running out of data to train their models on, we just don't know how soon the impacts will be felt. GPT-5.1 probably isn't a harbinger of doom for OpenAI, but it is interesting that it isn't an exponential improvement, either.
Disclosure: Lifehacker’s parent company, Ziff Davis, filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in April, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.
~~The Freshman~~










Submit a link to be included in the newsletter!
Shopping online? Google wants you to trust AI to click the buy button for you. Rolling out today, Google's new "agentic checkout" adds onto the company's existing price-tracking feature, so it's not something you'll see all the time. Instead, when you get a price drop notification on an object you've been tracking, you might now see a new "buy for me" button that will send all the necessary information to the store's website and make the final purchase for you.
Google says the AI will always ask your permission before starting agentic checkout, and will only go through with the purchase after you've confirmed all your shipping and payment details (which it will either pull from your Google Pay details, or directly ask you for). The price you'll see also isn't informed by AI, but rather by Google's Shopping Graph, the same information that powers Google Search's Shopping tab. That means it'll come directly from the store you'll be buying from, although while Google does promise it'll surface the most relevant offers for you, just trusting whatever the notification says will take away your ability to manually comparison shop. Once the AI has made your purchase for you, you should see all the usual confirmation emails hit whatever inbox you told the AI to link with your purchase.
It all makes sense in theory—you're essentially being given a link to a product, and then telling the AI to go to that link and fill out the checkout form for you. That should cut down on hallucination concerns, assuming you're happy with the link you're buying from. The catch is that every website's checkout form is a little different, so Google's starting with just a few stores for now, to cut down on the chance for errors. That means you'll only be able to try agentic checkout when buying from Wayfair, Chewy, Quince, and "select Shopify merchants" for now, but Google says there will be "many more [stores] coming soon."
While agentic checkout does take what can be a lengthy process down to a single click for buyers, the real use case here might be for sellers. Ensuring people actually click through to your store from a price drop notification can be a pain, and letting customers buy straight from the notification with a single button could make impulse purchases a bit more likely. If you notice yourself about to buy something just because a shiny new button is there, maybe take a beat before tapping it and consider whether you still want it or if you want to check other options yourself first.
If you want to try out agentic checkout for yourself, you'll first need to start tracking a product's price, and ensure it's something Wayfair, Chewy, or another participating retailer would sell. To do this, head to the Google Shopping tab, search for either a specific product or a broader product category, and scroll until you find a product card you want to track. Click through and hit the "Track price button." Here, choose a target price as well as options like size or color, and click "Update" in the bottom right corner. You'll now get a notification when a listing matches the parameters you set, and if the link Google found is from a participating store, you'll be able to use the "Buy for me" button. Click or tap it to ensure your details are correct, then tap "Buy for me with GPay" at the bottom of the screen. You'll get a progress bar showing when your purchase has been submitted and confirmed, and the page will tell you where to expect your confirmation email. You'll also get a Buy for me reference ID you can take to Google support, in case you run into any issues.
Unfortunately, it seems like there's still a few features Google needs to work on here before the AI can do everything a human can. A Google spokesperson told me that agentic checkout currently can't take factors like loyalty programs into account, so if you want to buy the product from a specific store account to get credit for it, you'll still need to make your purchase manually.
If you're buying a lot, it could be a time saver, but as for now, those caveats and the limited selection of stores means you'll probably still have to complete checkout yourself on most purchases right now.
Noted as of interest a day or so ago, ‘I don’t want anyone to suffer like I did’: the intersex campaigners fighting to limit surgery on children - am a bit gloomed to think that this is Still An Issue because I look back and surely this was brought to wider attention, oh, at least twenty or years ago?
Ah. A little delving shows me that the person I remember as doing pioneering research on the subject, published around the late 90s, and also involved in intersex activism, has become A Figure of Controversy and I think we probably do not mention them.
But quite coincidentally this emerged today: who, according to work done by A Very Reputable Scientist sequencing DNA which does appear to be his, had a Disorder of Sexual Development (as intersex conditions are sometimes termed)? Did Hitler really have a ‘micropenis’? The dubious documentary analysing the dictator’s DNA.
Here is a thoughtful and nuanced piece by an actual scientist taking issue with some of the more tabloidy accounts A slightly different take on the news that Hitler’s DNA reveals some genetic anomalies. The most interesting thing to me is that history has a profound capability for irony.
That Hitler himself had a condition that was discovered and named by a Jewish man who also held some responsibility for the scientifically misguided murderous policies of the Nazis is at least a reflection that history is often imbued with a sense of complex and confusing irony.