Write Every Day: Day 27

Apr. 27th, 2026 05:09 pm
sanguinity: (writing - semicolon)
[personal profile] sanguinity
Intro/FAQ
Days 1-15


We have a potential volunteer for half of May. Would anyone like to split the month with them? Please volunteer in the comments!


My check-in: A couple paragraphs over lunch. Perhaps more this evening.

Day 27: [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] sanguinity

Day 26: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] dswdiane, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] the_siobhan, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] ysilme

Day 25: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] dswdiane, [personal profile] glinda, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] the_siobhan, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] ysilme

More days )

When you check in, please use the most recent post and say what day(s) you’re checking in for. Remember you can drop in or out at any time, and let me know if I missed anyone!

Victory!

Apr. 27th, 2026 06:47 pm
aurumcalendula: Vinnie and Sonny from Wiseguy looking at each other (Vinnie and Sonny 2)
[personal profile] aurumcalendula
The fifth StudioWorks DVD set was the charm! (Considering this one was mailed in a poly mailer with no padding, I'm a bit surprised it arrived in pretty decent shape, let alone with a disc three that plays fine.)

Gilgamesh translated

Apr. 27th, 2026 09:49 pm
[syndicated profile] languagelog_feed

Posted by Victor Mair

‘Gilgamesh’ Review: Love and Death in Mesopotamia
The epic of Gilgamesh is more than 40 centuries old. Simon Armitage’s new translation feels thrillingly alive.
By William Giraldi, WSJApril 24, 2026

Much as I admire Simon Armitage's translation, I must say that I am overwhelmed by the excellence of the reviewer, William Giraldi.  He is much plauded for his fiction, literary criticism, and journalism.  Reading though this review, I often find myself celebrating his uncanny ability to find the mot juste at the very moment when I was wondering how he would extricate himself from a difficult, intricate sentence / thought.

There is something almost absurd about attempting to appraise “Gilgamesh,” as though one were asked to appraise wind, or love, or that first human thought that trembled toward language. And yet here comes Simon Armitage, the poet laureate of the U.K., with his stunning new verse translation, not as a vandal of antiquity but as a lucid accomplice to its endurance. As he does with his unimprovable versions of “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight” (2008) and “The Death of King Arthur” (2012), Mr. Armitage understands that the oldest stories are never old, only waiting for a new singer.  

His rendering does not genuflect before the epic, about the indomitable King Gilgamesh, whose adventuring kinship with Enkidu and grief over his death drive him on a profitless quest for immortality, so much as enter into a bold union with it. This is not a museum-piece translation, a dusty tablet behind glass, but a reanimation, a voice tugged up from the clay and made to speak again in a tongue that is ours. Mr. Armitage writes with a poet’s mastery of rhythm and rupture, refusing both the sterile fidelity of the scholar and the vulgar opportunism of the adapter. His is an epic that breathes—raggedly, unevenly, but thrillingly alive.

We must bear in mind that, in his quest for fidelity, Armitage has teamed up with Jacob Dahl, Oxford don who is a specialist of the pre-Classical cultures and languages of the Near East, whose work we have elsewhere separately followed, e.g.,  Dahl, J., "Proto-Elamite and linear elamite, a misunderstood relationship?", Akkadica, 2023; via WP: Proto-Elamite script.  Thanks to Yves Rehbein here.

The entire review, which is much longer than what I've excerpted here, is well worth reading for its insights and illuminations.  Heartily recommended for anyone who is interested in Gilgamesh.

Who was Gilgamesh?

Gilgamesh (/ˈɡɪlɡəmɛʃ//ɡɪlˈɡɑːmɛʃ/Akkadian: , romanized: Gilgāmeš; originally Sumerian: , romanized: Bilgames) was a hero in ancient Mesopotamian mythology and the protagonist of the Epic of Gilgamesh, an epic poem written in Akkadian during the late 2nd millennium BC. He was possibly a historical king of the Sumerian city-state of Uruk, who was posthumously deified. His rule probably would have taken place sometime in the beginning of the Early Dynastic Period, c. 2900–2350 BC, though he became a major figure in Sumerian legend during the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112 – c. 2004 BC). 

The modern form "Gilgamesh" is a direct borrowing of the Akkadian , rendered as Gilgāmeš. The Assyrian form of the name derived from the earlier Sumerian form , Bilgames. It is generally concluded that the name itself translates as "the (kinsman) is a hero", though what type of "kinsman" was meant is a point of controversy. It is sometimes suggested that the Sumerian form of the name was pronounced Pabilgames, reading the component bilga as pabilga (), a related term which described familial relations, but this is not supported by epigraphic or phonological evidence.

WP

Closing queries by June Teufel Dreyer:

One of the reviewers says that the original was written in Sumerian, a language with no know relatives.  So a unique written language? Can this be true?

We actually have several Sumerian specialists who are regular Language Log readers.  Maybe they will have some answers to these questions.

 

Selected readings

[ SECRET POST #7052 ]

Apr. 27th, 2026 04:53 pm
case: (Default)
[personal profile] case posting in [community profile] fandomsecrets

⌈ Secret Post #7052 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.


More! )


Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1007.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
lannamichaels: "In my defense the plums were delicious" written on a green background. (i ate your plums)
[personal profile] lannamichaels


Title: To Gather Paradise.
Author: [personal profile] lannamichaels
Fandom: Vorkosigan Saga
Series: Part 3 of I Dwell In Possibility
Pairing: Piotr Vorkosigan/Gregor Vorbarra, Piotr Vorkosigan/Ezar Vorbarra
Rating: R
A/N: When I wrote I Dwell In Possibility, I tried really really hard to make it Gregor/Piotr. And so I have kept at this fic since 2018, on and off, trying to make it work, so that I could announce BINGO on the fifth Vorbarra who I've had fuck Piotr. I am so proud of this bingo, I cannot even describe. The title is from I Dwell In Possibility (Poem 657) by Emily Dickinson.
Archives: Archive Of Our Own, SquidgeWorld

Summary: In a world filled with Cetagandans, Piotr supposes he can't allow himself to be perturbed by a time traveler.


Look I once saw someone write Vorkosigan/Vorbarra and I said that's not a pairing that's a challenge )

The Raven Tower by Ann Leckie (2019)

Apr. 27th, 2026 02:42 pm
pauraque: butterfly trailing a rainbow through the sky from the Reading Rainbow TV show opening (butterfly in the sky)
[personal profile] pauraque
I am back! I haven't really had a chance to catch up here yet, but here's my vacation read, for starters.

This stand-alone fantasy novel has a classic plot: A young soldier-prince hurries back from the front to inherit rulership from his dying father, only to find when he arrives at the capital that his uncle has usurped the throne. What makes the book stand out are the vivid characters and immersive worldbuilding—features that did not surprise me, having read and loved Leckie's science fiction for much the same reasons.

In the world of the book there are beings called gods, but their powers are subject to the laws of nature. They have to be careful what they try to will into existence, because if it requires too much energy or creates a paradox it can hurt or kill them, and if they don't understand the underlying principles of how something works they may not be able to do it at all. The gods have their own goals and internal politics, which humans often don't understand. I really liked how the consequences were worked out, with a mix of human beliefs about the gods—some accurate, some overcomplicated or oversimplified, and some fanciful wishful thinking. Even when it is actually possible to speak to the gods, some people will still only hear what they want to hear.

On the human side of the story, the themes struck me as thoroughly Shakespearean. The prince versus the conniving uncle, certainly, and more generally the impact of fatal character flaws and the focus on emotionally intimate relationships shaped by tricky power dynamics. The focal human character is not the prince Mawat, but his loyal retainer Eolo, a farmer's son turned soldier whose steadiness and observational skills are a balance to Mawat, who is smart but often lets his temper overrule his logic. When Mawat is being irrational, other characters beg Eolo to step in because Mawat will listen to him—except he doesn't always, and there is only so much Eolo can do within the bounds of hierarchy.

Eolo is also a trans man, which is a lens through which we learn a lot about how this world deals with people who fall outside social norms. I loved how this was handled. Different places have different attitudes toward queer people, and it's not a one-to-one mapping to real life views or a didactic take where the more queer-friendly folk are perfect "good guys". (None of the book's cultures are all good or all bad. They all have systemic problems and both admirable and ill-intentioned people in them.) Eolo's experiences and self-perceptions are grounded in the world he lives in. He's not an out-of-place transplant from our own world or an excuse to lecture to the reader. On the contrary, the book assumes the reader is savvy enough to pick up on nuanced points about gender and trans experiences without having them spelled out, and it's so refreshing.

The narrative is from the perspective of a god who uses second person to refer to Eolo as it observes his actions. This could be a barrier for some readers who are put off by long stretches of second person, but I found it very appropriate and not a distraction.

I would love it if Leckie wrote more novels in this world. I think she has some stories set in it, but I haven't gotten around to reading her short story collection yet.

2026 Sign-Ups Open

Apr. 27th, 2026 10:18 pm
morbane: woman sprawled on bed next to vinyl record, text "jukebox" (Jukebox)
[personal profile] morbane posting in [community profile] jukebox_fest
Here is the sign-up form. Welcome to this year's challenge! Sign-ups will close at 11:59pm EDT, Saturday 9 May.

You can request 3-10 canons, and offer 3-10 canons. If a canon doesn't appear in the drop-down menu when you go to enter it, you can copy and paste it from the tag set and press enter.

Each of your requests and offers must be tagged with 1-3 of the labels "Fanfiction", "Podfic", and "Fanart".

Your requests have a space for optional details. Go ahead and use them to talk about how you understand the song and what kind of art/fic/podfic you might like. However, your gift creator doesn't have to follow your prompts. They do have to respect clear and specific Do-Not-Wants listed in the sign-up (like "no pregnancy" "no scat" "no rainbows").

If you are requesting Podficcer's Choice of Fandom, it's up to a podfic artist what work they choose to record, though you are welcome to include likes and DNWs to inspire their choice.

Your requests have a space for a letter link, if you want to provide one. This link must be included before sign-ups are closed. If you are writing a letter, please have it complete and unlocked by the end of 13 May.

Opting in to treats: Please state if your AO3 preferences are set to allow you to receive treats or if you have this setting disabled. Include a statement in your optional details like Treats welcome or I have opted in to treats (or Treats disabled if true).

Podfic offering options

If you are offering podfic for a song or music video in the tag set, you are pledging to create both text and recording (500-5000 words). You are welcome to team up with a friend to create a work, whether you're the recording artist or the writer, but if that's what you intend, please contact us at jukebox.mod@gmail.com to let us know of the arrangement and to provide a contact email for your friend.

If you are offering podfic in combination with "Podficcer's Choice of Fandom", you are pledging to create a recording of a pre-existing song/MV fanwork, using your recipient's DNWs and general likes as guidance for your choice of fanwork. If this is the only thing you wish to match on, please say so in the Notes to Mods field so we don't accidentally send you a request where you have to write a story as well. Please make sure we can get in contact with you - ie, do you use the email account associated with your AO3 account? If not, please email us directly (jukebox.mod@gmail.com).


Notes to Mod in Offers

These are confidential notes where you can tell the mods (Minutia_R and Morbane) if you want to match in specific ways - for example, if you want to match on one request more than the others, or want to be assigned a recipient who has a letter. If you are a podfic artist who has to offer 3 fandoms but only wants to match on Podficcer's Choice of Fandom, please use Notes to Mods to say so. (Please don't tell us things like "I will not create anything in my DNWs" - if required to closely compare your own preferences and your potential recipients' preferences, we may miss something. Specific names, or anything we can quickly check, are fine.)

In recent years, AO3 has implemented a blocking feature - see AO3 news posts here, here, and here. This does not affect challenge matching, ie, someone you've blocked can still match to you. So if you have another participant blocked or they have blocked you, please use your offers and requests, your notes to mods, or both, to help us help you avoid interactions with them.

You can comment here or contact us at jukebox.mod@gmail.com if you have any questions about signing up.

Again, welcome!!


NB: Normally, we get the reference tables of all songs & music videos & lyrics up just before sign-ups. Unfortunately, I'm a little behind this year, so that will go up during the sign-up period. If you nominated, your links are still very welcome at this post and will help us complete the tables.

Write Every Day: Day 26

Apr. 26th, 2026 06:29 pm
sanguinity: (writing - semicolon)
[personal profile] sanguinity
Intro/FAQ
Days 1-15


Would anyone like to volunteer for May? Or for half of May, if you'd like to split the month with someone! Please volunteer in the comments!


My check-in: Alibi sentence just now so I could check in for the day. (Indeed, his flesh had the gaunt and livid look of a cockfish who had ceased to take food.) More writing once I get this posted.

Day 26: [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] ysilme

Day 25: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] dswdiane, [personal profile] glinda, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] the_siobhan, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] ysilme

Day 24: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] dswdiane, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] the_siobhan, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] ysilme

More days )

When you check in, please use the most recent post and say what day(s) you’re checking in for. Remember you can drop in or out at any time, and let me know if I missed anyone!
[syndicated profile] otw_news_feed

Posted by choux

The Organization for Transformative Works’s April Membership Drive is over and we are delighted to say that we are finishing with a total of $362,171.85 raised, far exceeding our goal of US$150,000. These donations came from 9,702 people in 87 countries: thank you to every single one of them, as well as to all of you who posted and shared the news about the drive!

We are particularly pleased that 8,035 donors chose to take up or renew an OTW membership with their donation. The OTW would not exist without its users all around the world, and your continued support for us is our absolute pride and joy! We are so glad to know that our ongoing mission to support, protect, and provide access to the history of fanworks and fan culture continues to resonate with the people that matter most of all: the fans themselves.

If you were intending to donate or join and haven’t yet done so, don’t worry! The OTW accepts donations all year and you can always choose to become a member with a donation of US$10 or more. Memberships run for one calendar year from the date of your donation, so if you donate now you’ll be able to vote in the 2026 OTW Board elections, which will take place in August. And our exclusive thank-you gifts are available whenever you donate!

Recent reading

Apr. 26th, 2026 07:42 pm
troisoiseaux: (reading 11)
[personal profile] troisoiseaux
Finished The Ritz of the Bayou by Nancy Lemann, a novelist's-eye nonfiction account of her time as a "girl reporter" covering the 1985 racketeering trial (and 1986 retrial) of the then-sitting Governor of Louisiana Edwin Edwards on assignment for Vanity Fair,* in airy snapshots with a vivid eye for personality and atmosphere, populated by characters referred to obliquely as "the jazz-crazed assistant prosecutor," "the courtroom existentialist" (distinguishable from "the courtroom philosopher" by his quirk of keeping a diary, since the 1950s, to rate every oyster he'd eaten), "the man from the train", "the Yankee reporter", etc. Truly just 100% vibes rather than any sort of political or legal commentary, but I found myself thinking, throughout, that there were still dots to connect between the attitude that, in the mid-1980s, Lemann credited specifically to "Louisiana politics"— that the public seemed to enjoy charismatic politicians behaving badly, as "the two great enemies of Louisianians are boredom and lack of style"; that, at one point, an "alleged bribe . . . was scoffed at {by the defense} as being an amount too low to constitute a decent bribe, an indication of the moral tenor"— and American Politics These Days; Lemann does in fact connect them in her afterword to this new 40th anniversary edition.

* She turned in her story and the Vanity Fair editor "basically said Huh? What?" and paid her a "kill fee" and then Lemann turned that story into this book.

Turned back to War and Peace, which I've been neglecting lately. Since joining the Freemasons, Pierre has made a half-hearted (or, rather, whole-hearted but half-assed?) attempt at improving the lot of his serfs— unfortunately, he let himself be talked into downgrading Plan A: free the serfs!!! into Plan B: improve the lives and workload of the serfs...?, which under self-serving estate managers turned into paving the road to hell with good intentions— and visited the Bolkonskys, while an increasingly cynical Andrew tries to adjust to widowered fatherhood and civilian life.

The Jewish War: Last half of book 6

Apr. 26th, 2026 04:38 pm
cahn: (Default)
[personal profile] cahn
Last week:Lament for the destroyed trees and landscape around Jerusalem. A woman eats her own child. More discussion of Titus and whether he wanted to spare the Temple or not. The Carthage and Alexandria precedents for Romans treating defeated opponents. Torching a temple = REALLY BAD LUCK. The timetable of the siege of Jerusalem set by Vespasian's ascent as emperor.

This week: The aftermath of the burning of the temple, and the end of the siege of Jerusalem. Still some pretty awful stuff.

Next week: First half of book 7... isn't this the last book?! OK, [personal profile] selenak, give us a stopping point... :)

icon meme

Apr. 26th, 2026 07:25 pm
aurumcalendula: blue-green image of Wen Kexing and Zhou Zishu facing each other ('save it')
[personal profile] aurumcalendula
Snagged from [personal profile] regshoe:

Reply to this post saying 'icon', and I will tell you my favorite icon of yours. Then post this to your own journal using your own favorite icon if you're one of those inhuman things that are actually capable of choosing between YOUR PRECIOUS BABIES! userpics.
(It was so hard to choose an icon for this post!)

[ SECRET POST #7051 ]

Apr. 26th, 2026 05:10 pm
case: (Default)
[personal profile] case posting in [community profile] fandomsecrets

⌈ Secret Post #7051 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



More! )


Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1007.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

my 3w4dw cleanup

Apr. 26th, 2026 09:32 pm
grrlpup: yellow rose in sunlight (Default)
[personal profile] grrlpup
I was scrolling through the friending meme for Three Weeks for Dreamwidth, then realized there's actually a large handful of people whom I know at least a little on Dreamwidth but who have somehow fallen out of my Reading Page or not been added correctly. I catch them haphazardly via comments, secondhand news from sanguinity or other mutuals... but tidying up my circle is a better way. :D

So if you are one of those getting a notification that I've subscribed and/or granted access, that's what's going on, and thank you for sharing DW with me!

(no subject)

Apr. 26th, 2026 12:37 pm
skygiants: Princess Tutu, facing darkness with a green light in the distance (Default)
[personal profile] skygiants
It's been several days since I finished Cristina Rivera Garcia's No One Will See Me Cry (translated by Andrew Hurley) and I've still sort of singularly failed to formulate an opinion about it; I just keep sort of mentally picking the book up and turning it over and putting it uneasily down again.

In some ways this book reminds me of A Month in the Country, in that both are historical novels that delicately build up a picture of lives destabilized by and lived in the cracks after an epoch-shaking event, while carefully avoiding -- tracing the parameters of, writing around, turning the camera consistently away from -- the event itself. The difference is that A Month in the Country does in fact feel light, delicate, balanced against the heavy thing at its center, while No One Will See Me Cry isn't in any way a light book; aside from the heaviness of its subject matter, feels laden with symbolism at every turn, although the symbolism itself is often specific and startling.

The premise: in 1920s Mexico City, an aging, morphine-addicted photographer who's been hired to take portraits of asylum inmates meets Matilda, a woman he last photographed many years ago, when she was a prostitute. Joaquin engages in a kind of narrative barter with, first the asylum doctor, then with Matilda herself, in an attempt to understand her story and how it intersects with his own to bring them both to this asylum. Both of them, it turns out, formatively knew and formatively loved the same woman, a revolutionary, in the years before the war -- but neither of them was actually involved in the Revolution, neither of them were active agents for or against the transformation of their livetimes; Joaquin describes himself more than once as the only photographer of his generation who didn't take any photographs of the war, and Matilda was, at the time, involved in an emotional affair with a desert landscape.

There are some tropes that one expects, and is braced for, around Women and Lost Women and Madwomen, especially when insanity is used as a thematic metaphor around national trajectory, especially when all that is inextrictable from questions of poverty and indigineity. Rivera Garcia is definitely deploying some of those tropes with purpose and to a point and I absolutely do not know enough to have a full sense of what she's doing with them. This is one of those situations where I wish I was reading a book in context of a class or a club. As it is, what I'm left with is interest, unease, some beautiful and surprising images, and a sense that I ought to read a lot more about the Mexican Revolution.

Buttons' Buttons

Apr. 26th, 2026 04:43 pm
[syndicated profile] languagelog_feed

Posted by Mark Liberman

Below is a guest post/email by Preston C.:


I wanted to share a compact ambiguous sentence in the spirit of “Buffalo buffalo…,” but built from more ordinary English resources:

In Buttons’ Buttons, Buttons Buttons buttons Buttons Buttons’ buttons Buttons Buttons’ buttons’ buttons button.

One workable parse treats “Buttons Buttons” as a proper name, “Buttons’ Buttons” as a store, and button/buttons as verbs (“to fasten”). On that reading, the sentence means roughly:

In the store Buttons’ Buttons, Buttons Buttons fastens the buttons that his buttons’ buttons fasten.

What’s interesting is how it scales. If you try to extend it via clausal embedding (stacking more “that…” clauses), the result remains grammatical but quickly loses semantic coherence. But if the recursion is pushed into the possessive chain instead, it remains interpretable:

his buttons —> his buttons’ buttons —> his buttons’ buttons’ buttons —> …

This can be captured by a simple schema:

NP₀ = Buttons Buttons’ buttons

NPₙ₊₁ = NPₙ’s buttons

So unlike the classic buffalo sentence—which tolerates repeated clausal stacking—this construction seems to support stable recursion primarily within the possessive domain. More generally, it suggests a contrast between recursion that preserves a hierarchy of reference (as in possessive chains) and recursion that reuses or reassigns roles (as in clausal stacking), the latter degrading more quickly.

I’m curious whether this strikes you as a genuine pattern or just an artifact of this particular sentence. I haven’t seen this configuration discussed, though I may be missing prior examples.


Above is a guest post by Preston C. — comments welcome.

For background, see "Buffaloing buffalo", 1/20/2005
"and21", 5/24/2010
"Buffalo shit", 5/15/2021

The Legend of Vox Machina

Apr. 26th, 2026 12:08 pm
settiai: (TLoVM -- settiai)
[personal profile] settiai


To the shock of absolutely no one, I have thoughts related to the Season 4 trailer that was released for The Legend of Vox Machina a few days ago.

Vague spoilers for CR1 under the cut for those trying to go in unspoiled for the campaigns, since there may or may not be similarities in the animated series for some storylines. )
primeideal: Lando Calrissian from Star Wars (lando calrissian)
[personal profile] primeideal
Spinoff from the Vorkosigan Saga, set two hundred years before the main series. Leo Graf, an engineer who works for the huge GalacTech company, is sent to a space station to instruct apprentice engineers. Turns out that most of the residents are children (the oldest class is twenty) who were genetically modified to have two extra arms instead of legs and other tweaks to be healthier/optimized for zero-gravity, and are known as "quaddies." Leo is able to stay calm and not react with revulsion, but the more he learns about the quaddies' precarious legal status and treatment, the more he feels like he needs to do something about it, even if he's just one guy. The good news is, sometimes social and ethical problems turn out to be just engineering problems...

In some ways, Leo is a foil to Miles; Miles is a disabled person, surrounded by able-bodied people, but he bluffs his way through things and his heroism turns out to be contagious. Leo is an able-bodied person, surrounded by the quaddies, who are seen as disabled in planetary gravity, and his leadership is similar.
 
Or,” Leo raised his voice, “you can take your lives into your own hands. Come with me and put all your risks up front. The big gamble for the big payoff. Let me tell you”—he gulped for courage, mustered megalomania—for surely only a maniac could drive this through to success— “let me tell you about the Promised Land . . .”
I had recently reread part of "The Warrior's Apprentice" so the "please don't yell loudly when you're making a surprise entrance into the room" thing was fresh in my mind...
Even if Colonel Wayne in Nest of Doom led his troops into battle with his rebel yell over their comlinks, I don’t think real marines would do that. It would be bound to interfere with their communications.
There's a similar line with "we have to be careful about what videos we show people." "Oooh, pornography?!" "...No." that has Miles and Elena parallels.

And, of course, the themes of seeing the inherent worth and dignity in every human life, even the smallest and most vulnerable, are clear. (The quaddies were also products of the uterine replicators from Beta Colony, which leads the galaxy in a lot of technological innovations.) There's also a character whose bitterness is similar to that of the villain in "Mountains of Mourning"--when your life has been crushed by the system, it feels unfair for other people to have opportunities that you were denied.

As with Cordelia, Leo's worldview is informed by Christianity, but he's not tendentious about it. Can we jeopardize the mission to rescue one guy:

"Maybe. I’m not sure it’s good military thinking—the precedent had to do with sheep, I believe—but I don’t think I could live with myself if we didn’t at least try to get him back."

The weird legal status of the space station is kind of a parallel with "A Drop of Corruption":
GalacTech holds Rodeo on a ninety-nine-year lease with the government of Orient IV. The original terms of the lease were extremely favorable to us...
A great description of what planetary gravity would be like if you'd never experienced it before:
Leading from the hatch to the hangar floor was a kind of corrugated ramp. Clearly, it was designed to break down the dangerous fight with the omnipresent gravity into little manageable increments. “Stairs.”
The authorities try to enforce a "mothers are naturally parental, they must mind the babies, menfolk do the other stuff" policy, which Leo thinks is ridiculous, coming from a galaxy with uterine replicators, and the upshot is that a new father doesn't understand things like diaper rash and has to have his partner explain it. A good example of the limitations of this kind of societal structure, without being preachy. (This book features the most gripping, stressful, action-packed scene hinging on a diaper bag you've ever seen.)

Early on, it's established that quaddie education focuses on engineering, not great men of history...

“...a typical downsider history of, say, the settlement of Orient IV usually gives about fifteen pages to the year of the Brothers’ War, a temporary if bizarre social aberration—and about two to the actual hundred or so years of settlement and building-up of the planet. Our text gives one paragraph to the war. But the building of the Witgow trans-trench monorail tunnel, with its subsequent beneficial economic effects to both sides, gets five pages. In short, we emphasize the common instead of the rare, building rather than destruction, the normal at the expense of the abnormal. So that the quaddies may never get the idea that the abnormal is somehow expected of them. If you’d like to read the texts, I think you’ll get the idea very quickly.”
“I—yeah, I think I’d better,” Leo murmured. The degree of censorship imposed upon the quaddies implied by Yei’s brief description made his skin crawl—and yet, the idea of a text that devoted whole sections to great engineering works made him want to stand up and cheer.
And we get a nice payoff to this much later:
 
Shooting people was such a stupid activity, why should everybody—anybody!—be so impressed? Silver wondered irritably. You would think she had done something truly great, like discover a new treatment for black stem-rot.

Polar exploration drinking game!
“What if someone asks what happened to my feet?” Silver worried aloud.
“Amputated,” suggested Leo, “due to a terrible case of frostbite suffered on your vacation to the Antarctic Continent.”
I've said this before, but Bujold is great at the "leaving out the parts people skip" of pacing. Like, "Claire and Tony have some questions for Leo about the legal situation elsewhere in the galaxy" > "Claire and Tony make a run for it" follows pretty quickly in succession, whereas in other books I feel like there would be a lot more hedging/introspection before that.

Spoilers )
Bingo: so, we get one mulligan square every year, and while I have not availed myself of it for the first four, this might be the time when I use one. You could probably make an argument for "politics" but by that token I think you could make an argument for almost anything for "politics."

Edit to add: the ancient and honorable male art of "monitoring the situation!" :D
 
“Since then we’ve been tracking the D-620, and it’s continued to boost straight toward Rodeo. It doesn’t answer our calls.”
“What are you doing about it?”
“We’re monitoring the situation. I have not yet received orders to do anything about it.”

Profile

seekingferret: Two warning signs one above the other. 1) Falling Rocks. 2) Falling Rocs. (Default)
seekingferret

April 2026

S M T W T F S
   1234
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 27282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags