(no subject)
Jan. 26th, 2015 08:41 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
seekingferretDanger 5 Season 2 is coming out. We're up to Episode 4.
Danger 5 doesn't really do parody, as we know it. It also doesn't really do pastiche. I'm not sure I have the word for what they do, because it sits in the same territory as those things, but it isn't those things. Surrealist pastiche, maybe? There's a thing they accomplish on a consistent basis, which is to make you think they're heading for a trope, and then they subvert the trope not by subverting the trope but by doing something so out of left field that it's not even in the same ballpark as the trope.
In general, my love for this season is not quite as unabashed as my love for Season 1. I mean, obviously there are problems with Season 1 aside from the intentional problems, but the writing is so sharp that my tendency is to overlook them. Season 2 has been clunkier. Outside of the simple episodic formula that drove Season 1, there have been fumbles to reestablish characters and storytelling devices. I think they're also running into the limits of using so many one-note characters. The characters have felt out of character, compared to their static Season 1 versions, and the tactic of subjecting them to new pressures has not really had results that were either emotional resonant or even very funny. Their fridging of Claire in the first episode was frustrating on feminist grounds and has not been used effectively since.
On the other hand, I've enjoyed every episode more than the previous one, and episode four was the one that most had the feel of a season 1 episode: the strange geopolitics of the Vatican, the goofy fast food, the matrioshka doll phone, the Pope marionette, and ultimately Hitler's macabre Dantean descent. McKenzie felt most integrated into the team and Pierre, Tucker, Jackson and even to some extent Ilsa had actual emotional arcs. There were more quotable lines.
So I'm holding out hope for a clean finish to the season. It's even possible that some of the bad parts have been deliberate, since the show's using more continuity than it did in season 1 and there may be payoff to delayed jokes. We'll see, I guess.
Danger 5 doesn't really do parody, as we know it. It also doesn't really do pastiche. I'm not sure I have the word for what they do, because it sits in the same territory as those things, but it isn't those things. Surrealist pastiche, maybe? There's a thing they accomplish on a consistent basis, which is to make you think they're heading for a trope, and then they subvert the trope not by subverting the trope but by doing something so out of left field that it's not even in the same ballpark as the trope.
In general, my love for this season is not quite as unabashed as my love for Season 1. I mean, obviously there are problems with Season 1 aside from the intentional problems, but the writing is so sharp that my tendency is to overlook them. Season 2 has been clunkier. Outside of the simple episodic formula that drove Season 1, there have been fumbles to reestablish characters and storytelling devices. I think they're also running into the limits of using so many one-note characters. The characters have felt out of character, compared to their static Season 1 versions, and the tactic of subjecting them to new pressures has not really had results that were either emotional resonant or even very funny. Their fridging of Claire in the first episode was frustrating on feminist grounds and has not been used effectively since.
On the other hand, I've enjoyed every episode more than the previous one, and episode four was the one that most had the feel of a season 1 episode: the strange geopolitics of the Vatican, the goofy fast food, the matrioshka doll phone, the Pope marionette, and ultimately Hitler's macabre Dantean descent. McKenzie felt most integrated into the team and Pierre, Tucker, Jackson and even to some extent Ilsa had actual emotional arcs. There were more quotable lines.
So I'm holding out hope for a clean finish to the season. It's even possible that some of the bad parts have been deliberate, since the show's using more continuity than it did in season 1 and there may be payoff to delayed jokes. We'll see, I guess.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-26 08:09 pm (UTC)On the other hand, it wasn't a lot of fun when Ilsa watched Rommel rape Jackson and laughed about it. I'm feeling rather unhappy about that whole scene.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-26 08:59 pm (UTC)1. The three-way confusion about romantic goals that drove the scene. Jackson thought Ilsa was romantically interested in him, but she was only trying to make Khrushchev jealous. Ilsa thought Jackson was just her platonic friend, but he was (obviously) sexually interested in her. And Rommel thought Jackson and Ilsa were lovers, and he could make her jealous by having sex with her, but Ilsa is an emotionless Russian without feelings. The scene unfolds because everyone is completely wrong about what everyone else actually wants, and I found that funny because everyone is so transparent about their desires.
2. The Golden Ilsa mask, because they showed it several times earlier in the episode, but it didn't register until he said and you took a closer look. Plus, the fact that it's gold, because Rommel and gold. Everything else about that joke was terrible.
3. The bizarreness of the turning into a cow thing. Precisely what I mean about Danger 5's tendency to untrope things by taking an unexpected leftfield turn.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-27 07:41 am (UTC)I didn't think the Ilsa mask looked anything like her, so I just sort of shrugged and went with it. On the other hand, "I don't want you back - I want to BE you", was unexpected and enjoyably over-the-top. If it had stopped there. I was hoping that Rommel would either be a gloriously terrible Ilsa, or that he (or other gender designation) would be a halfway-good Ilsa. (Then either Jackson could have been briefly - VERY briefly - confused, or there could have been an Ilsa-off. I would have liked an Ilsa-off.)
I have no complaints about the cow thing. Or the cat thing, actually, except that Ilsa could have been more dramatically catlike. There could have been a silly wig there.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-27 04:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-28 02:23 pm (UTC)