(no subject)

Date: 2016-06-28 12:40 pm (UTC)
seekingferret: Two warning signs one above the other. 1) Falling Rocks. 2) Falling Rocs. (Default)
Yeah, I overheard some ~9th graders talking excitedly about similar ideas during Tikkun Leil this year, and while most of me didn't want to damp their enthusiasm, it now seems really silly to me to pin too much of your emunah on any specific mechanical correlation between the days of creation and the current scientific calculation of the age of the universe. First, because scientists are still gaining important new observations that are adjusting their calculations in ways that might ruin any current correlation as surely as the Rambam's dependence on Aristotelian physics was ruined, but more primarily, because the important question isn't whether or not Bereishis and the Big Bang are correlated, the important question is why Hashem would use such an esoteric, allusive, metaphoric representation of scientific Creation to open a book that is fundamentally not a science textbook. Whatever the purpose(s) of Bereishis, it is not to teach Jews how matter and energy came to be.

But anyway, more on that when I finish the reread.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting

Profile

seekingferret: Two warning signs one above the other. 1) Falling Rocks. 2) Falling Rocs. (Default)
seekingferret

August 2025

S M T W T F S
     12
3 4567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags